Page 3 / 25
291 posts in total. Keep on posting.
Showing posts 25–36 of 291. Each entry opens locally on this site; legacy Hexo posts link back to their original article at the bottom for reference.
2026
- 中
MoE 计算-通信细粒度重叠:用 Tile 级信号把 All-to-All 藏在 GEMM 背后
一个不做内核融合的 producer-consumer 设计:用 tile 级设备驻留信号、远端归属对齐的行布局、以及互不干扰的 SM 分区,把 MoE 第二次 all-to-all 的通信开销藏进专家计算里,在 4 张 A100 上拿到最高 2.74 倍 MoE 层加速。
- EN
AnchorKV: Anchor-Residual KV Cache Compression
AnchorKV keeps every single token in the KV cache alive at 20x compression by projecting each token onto its nearest exactly-stored anchor and spending a small residual budget only where it moves the attention output the most.
- 中
AnchorKV:锚点-残差表示下的 KV 缓存压缩阅读笔记
AnchorKV 把每个 token 都投影到离它最近的一个精确保留的『锚点』上,再把剩余的字节预算精准花在最影响注意力输出的残差上,在 20 倍压缩比下一个 token 都不丢,精度还比驱逐类方法高一大截。
- EN
GRPO vs. Dr. GRPO Is Not a Bug-Fix Story: An Impossibility Theorem for Length Bias in Group RL
A short, sharp impossibility theorem shows that no length-based weighting scheme for group-relative policy optimization can be simultaneously gradient-unbiased and length-invariant — GRPO and Dr. GRPO are two ends of one unavoidable Pareto tradeoff, not a broken algorithm and its fix.
- 中
GRPO 和 Dr. GRPO 不是「修复」关系:一个关于长度偏差的不可能性定理
一篇短小精悍的不可能性定理证明:任何只依赖长度的加权方案都无法同时做到梯度无偏和长度不变——GRPO 与 Dr. GRPO 只是同一条不可避免的 Pareto 权衡曲线上的两个端点,而不是一个算法和它的修复版。
- EN
BLADE: Boundary-Expanded and Layer-Adaptive Dynamic Exit for Efficient LLM Reasoning
Self-doubt words like 'Wait' are not the only place a reasoning model already has the right answer — BLADE shows that ordinary sentence boundaries hide most of the early-exit opportunity, and picking the right hidden layers matters as much as picking the right checkpoint.
- 中
BLADE 阅读笔记:把「早退」这件事从自我怀疑词扩展到普通句子边界
推理模型早就写出了正确答案,却还要靠「Wait」这种自我怀疑词才敢喊停——BLADE 发现真正的早退机会大多藏在普通句子边界里,选对探针层和选对检查点一样重要。
- EN
FEPLB: Exploiting Copy Engines for Nearly Free MoE Load Balancing in Distributed Training
MoE routing imbalance wastes 18.6% of GPU time even without an auxiliary loss — FEPLB shows the fix does not need a new communication path, it needs the NVLink Copy Engine hardware that current frameworks leave idle.
- 中
FEPLB 阅读笔记:用 Copy Engine 几乎零成本地做 MoE 负载均衡
即使不加辅助负载均衡损失,MoE 路由不均也会白白浪费 18.6% 的 GPU 时间——FEPLB 的答案不是设计更聪明的调度算法,而是发现 Hopper 架构上一直闲置的 NVLink Copy Engine 硬件。
- EN
Back from the Future: KV Cache Management by Counter-Causal Surprise
A training-free KV-cache eviction rule that asks a strange but powerful question -- can the future predict this token? -- and in doing so escapes the self-reinforcing bias that quietly poisons every attention-score-based eviction method.
- 中
来自未来的信号:用反因果惊奇度做 KV Cache 淘汰
一个不需要训练的 KV Cache 淘汰策略,用一个反直觉的问题——这个 token 能被它后面的内容预测出来吗——绕开了几乎所有基于注意力分数的淘汰方法都存在的自我强化偏差。
- EN
DynaCalKV: Rethinking Fixed Head Grouping in Low-Rank KV Cache Compression
Fixed group sizes for attention-head clustering in low-rank KV cache compression turn out to be a needless assumption — letting similarity structure itself decide the groups saves parameters, but only if you already have enough independent heads to cluster.